Friday, July 23, 2010
Demons In Your Data?
Somehow, the process of changing the offending data to something arbitrary, then changing it back to the way it should be can remedy unexplained behaviors. I'm not talking about changing a value and then hitting the undo command. I'm talking about using Revit's tools to change the data to something arbitrary then changing it back... like the change is some new data for the model. It's just a matter of isolating the parameter values that are causing the unexplained behaviors... then finding the right combination of commands that will reset or refresh the offending data. These commands might include flexing parameters, cut & paste in same place, nudging, or possibly other commands. Let me give you some examples...
I upgraded a model once, from Revit 2009 to Revit 2011, and an odd thing happened. In hidden line mode, half the doors and windows had shaded glass (by design) while the other half had no shading. And it wasn't like there was any consistency... the shading was gone from random doors and windows. I realized at that point that I had a demon in my data, so I went into the offending material (glass) and set the surface pattern of the glass material to none (it was the surface pattern that was not cooperating), then changed the surface pattern back to solid fill to get this glass material to show properly everywhere.
Another thing that happens a lot... I like to nest families into a host family and link the parameters of the nested family and its host family, but once in a while after making a change to a nested family and loading it back into the host family, solids disappear or just don't flex when the family is loaded into a project. I have to flex some of the linked parameters, while still in the family editor, to reset or refresh the offending data.
Wall cleanups at intersections (not to beat a dead horse) can also cause demons. Sometimes nudging one of the walls can cleanup your intersection. Sometimes you have to cut a wall to your clipboard and paste it back into the same place to get intersections to heal properly. In fact, when any family (that was working fine before) isn't cooperating try a cut and paste in same place. This can reset data in the model.
If any of my readers are familiar with a particular demon please feel free to leave a comment describing the demon and how you "exorcised" it.
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Remodels in Revit... the untold story
The first step is pretty staight forward... build your as-built model in the existing phase. Once an as-built model is done I like to archive a copy of the model just incase the design scope changes and we have to start all over again with a clean as-built. Now I'm sure you are all aware that as the design develops the project architect and the client are both going to want to explore varying design iterations. The model builder is going to have to do partial demolition of walls, floors, roofs, ceilings, etc. The way most Revit Beginners go about doing this is to split the wall, floor, roof, etc into two parts and demo the half they want to remove (just like you would on a construction site). The problem with this method starts to reveal itself after 2-3 design iterations when the as-built model has so many pieces split apart that mending them back together is too challenging and time consuming. You could split and mend, split and mend, split and mend each design iteration, but we prefer not to do that because it's still time consuming.
So what do you do with partial demos? We create a new phase between Existing and New Construction called "Existing To Remain." We then copy the element to be demo'd to the clipboard... then demo the whole element in the "Existing to Remain" phase... paste the element (into the same place) back into the "Existing to Remain" phase and then reshape the new version of our element. Now anytime the design goes through iterations all you have to do is reshape the new element while leaving the as-built model preserved and intact. Call it a workaround if you like but that's how we preserve an as-built model throughout the life of an ever-changing project.
Other notes on remodels:
- Replacing windows and doors can be done by placing an existing opening family in your wall... loading in an existing wall hosted door/window (one without an opening) and demolishing the family while leaving the opening family intact... Then load a similar new door/window into the model to replace the existing element.
- Wall cleanups can also be challenging for remodels. You'll likely have to use a combination of edit wall joins and miter or disallow join and join geometry to resolve these connections so your plans and elevations are clean no matter which phase is shown.
- When you reshape a roof it's very likely that at the same time you'll be reshaping an exterior wall that is "attached" to the roof... so you'll have to do partial demos of both the roof and the wall.
This all came up because I was in a meeting yesterday with a project architect. He informed me that one of our projects was going to be redesigned and that he wanted us to reinstate the as-built model and start from scratch, but when he went into the model to try to work with the as-built it was "a mess" because the as-built model was grouped and pinned (and he didn't know how to work with a model that was setup like that). All I could think to myself was "YES! I grouped and pinned the as-built model because I didn't want anyone screwing with it."
It took me 30 minutes to remove the previous new construction work, isolate the as-built model, link it into a new blank project template and bind the as-built model so we could develop this new design with our latest project template (this was an older project that was coming back to life).
The as-built model is sacred ground. Once it's built you have to work to preserve it.
Thursday, June 24, 2010
When is a Family Parametric?
Answer: Anyone who knows the family editor can tell you, it takes time to build complex families with parameter driven flexing geometry. They can also tell you that some families flex... and some don't.
Question: Why would you want a family that doesn't flex?
Answer: The more complex your geometery, the more difficult and time consuming a fully parametric family is going to be and we all have deadlines. On top of which, your client might change the design of the component dozens of times. Do you think your going to have time to remake a complex and fully parametric family dozens of times? Probably not.
Question: So what do I do with highly complex and custom families that will likely change from week to week?
Answer: Build a placeholder family. A placeholder is a family that has just enough geometry to illustrate the component in your plans, elevations, and sections. It doesn't have to flex, it just has to illustrate your design intent.
Question: So, now that the design of my component is finalized, now I can make it fully parametric right?
Answer: The only families that are worth the time it takes to make fully parametric are families that are going to be used over and over and over again in most of your projects. For instance we have typical doors, windows, fireboxes, raftertails, roof tiles, etc. that we use all the time. These families are worth spending the time to make fully parametric. But, we also have custom doors, windows, etc. that are custom made to fit a given project, and no other. These families are often not typical in shape so we don't take the time to make their geometry flexing just for the sake of the one project... We do however make sure that their parameters schedule correctly in the final documents (whether the family flexes or not).
Families that are fully parametric can also be difficult for users to "reshape" after the fact without running into countless warnings.
Friday, April 16, 2010
Should I enable Hardware Acceleration?
- realistic materials in realistic view
- ambient occlusion
- performance of mechanical views
- performance of underlay views
- performance of overall project
Saturday, April 10, 2010
Often Overlooked By Beginners (Part 2)
3. Stretching a gridline in the current view only. When working with gridlines for the first time a beginner will often take notice that stretching the end bubble of a gridline stretches the grid in all views globally. The next question they ask is, "How can I stretch it for this view only?" Well there is a little icon next to a grid bubble that reads "3D." Click on the icon and you'll notice that it now reads "2D." You are now free to strech the gridline for the current view only. The location of the original 3D grid bubble is at the hollow circle you see below.
Friday, March 26, 2010
Editable Worksets and Workset Ownership


Wednesday, January 20, 2010
In-place Cavity Walls


Monday, January 11, 2010
Some New Bloggers on the Block
Oliver is the author of Revit In Motion
and you can find more interesting reading at revitflow
I look forward to reading your posts guys.
Wednesday, December 30, 2009
More Decorative Line Drawings in Revit
There were a couple of factors that determined our methodology:
1. Most new hires know AutoCAD and not Revit and can work fairly quickly in AutoCAD.
2. When it comes to 2D detail like decorative tilework on a wall or other highly decorative components (that would take too long to model in Revit) these elements can be drafted in AutoCAD fairly quickly and then imported for placing on a surface. It's very important to know a quick method like this for generating detailed line drawings that might change frequently in the schematic design phase as they often do on our projects. In addition, if these AutoCAD files are LINKED in they can be updated frequently by a draftsperson and then reloaded into the Revit model without having to reposition them. AutoCAD files can be placed in the "current view only" or can be placed 3 dimensionally in all views, but it takes a little longer to orient a linked dwg in 3 dimensional space onto the surface you want. We only do this when we want to see low relief detail in a camera view.
3. Revit is very useful for solving 3D problems, like determining valleys and ridges of awkwardly intersecting roofs for generating roof plans or elevations and for seeing into the structure to resolve other possible clashes.
4. In addition to linking dwgs into a project you can also import them into families. We do this a lot for our flush doors when we want to add a lot of custom detail to a flush wood door. Rather than model all that detail, just paste the dwg onto the surface of the flush door.
5. AutoCAD files are a good place holder until such time that the design changes settle down and you can find time to model low relief elements.
In conclusion, if you do have a practice that designs a lot of decorative detail into your custom architecture, consider using AutoCAD to draft your detail and then nest the dwgs into your projects and families. While this method may not be practical for offices that are interested in the rendering features of Revit, they are very practical tips for quickly generating line drawings for schematic design and construction documents using both Revit and AutoCAD.
Thursday, August 20, 2009
Additive Views vs. Subtractive Views
Reason: In the default Revit tempate almost every category is unnecessarily turned on in all views so the same family shows up everywhere.
Solution: Create Additive Views instead of Subtractive Views for family categories that are only used in one or two views. By that I mean, start with most family categories turned off in your new view's visibility/graphics and gradually add the categories that you want to see.
Extra Tip: If you want future new views to be additive by default, create a view template. Then, when you apply the template to a view, check the option that reads "Apply automatically to new views of the same type."




